.
Many of us have complained about the airbnb review system. It is a rankingsystem much similar to the ranking in the top contributor list to the right of the startpage.
I am currently (June 14, 2018) No 2 on that list, do I deserve to be there? I am afraid no. I am there due to two posts I have published in the airbnb-thread „Clarity about the new superhost criteria change“. For one of my posts I got 590 thumbs ups, for the second I got 173 thumbs ups.
I did a research on this superhost thread to find out what the reason is I got so many thumbs ups. Is it the content of my posts or is it something else?
In this thread right now there are 401 answering posts from community members on 27 pages.
What is the average number of thumbs ups based on which page they where published on?
Page:........................................................1..........2..........3..........4..........5..........10
Average thumbs ups per post.........274.......28........19.........6..........4...........6
Can it be, that posts on page 1 have such a highly valuable content and starting with page 2, the content quality goes down the cliff? Certainly not. The answer is, how much thumbs ups You get does not depend on the content quality, it depends on what page You publish. And therefore, the ranking of the contributor list is wrong.
I am right now No 2 on the list, have published 228 posts in the last 3 months and almost all my thumbs ups come from 2 posts. My dear Friend Rebecca from Oregon has published 1165 posts in one year and is No 4. Shouldn't Rebecca be infront of me? No. 1 right now is Brenden from Palm Beach. All he did in his live was asking one question on the June2018 Host Q&A and he asked the question on top of page 1.
What can we learn from this?
The number on thumbs ups someone gets does not depend on the contentquality of the post, it depends on the page You have posted on.
If there are multiple pages of any kind, it is always important to be on page 1.
This is a good example how important it is, to be on page 1 of searchresults, there You make it. Page 2 or 3 may be good enough to survive, starting page 4 You are dead. The reality obviously is, everyone reads page one, some people read page 2 and 3 and then it goes down the drain.
Airbnb should not be surprised that hosts fight against bad reviews like a lion, bc their average rating and being a superhost or not, determines on which page they end up in search results.
And the criteria for the guest ratings often reflect nothing else but the insanity of human behaviour. Guest often give bad ratings bc the wheather was bad, their car broke down, host didn't agree on a 8 hrs earlier check in, they ran into an argument with their host or they claimed money back and they didn't get it. All this has nothing to do with hosting quality and it upsets everyone.
So, based on this, airbnb should not be surprised about the headwind they are getting for their new 4.7* / 4.8* requirements.
---------------
This is the thread I took my data from:
https://community.withairbnb.com/t5/Airbnb-Updates/Clarity-about-the-recent-Superhost-criteria-chang...